Obama’s jihad friendly policy invites domestic attacks

According to the FBI, there are now active ISIS and other jihadist cells here in the United States. President Obama has just announced similar jihad-friendly policies (July 2015) as what he had imposed on the Border Patrol in 2012. If attacked, our forces are to run and hide. In the case of our military, they are NOT allowed have guns.

Which side is he on?

Which side is he on?

The Obama response to the recent attacks on U.S. bases and recruiting stations in our homeland  (WHICH ARE GUN FREE ZONES) is to:

  • Intense campaign to keep our military facilities as “gun free zones,” as per the Clinton Administration Order. It is abundantly clear that Obama will NEVER allow our military to be armed on domestic bases, even if their local commander wish them to be.
  • Recommend our military recruiters NOT wear their uniforms.
  • Recommend that troops manning our recruiting stations draw their blinds and hide.
  • Set a policy saying that having armed civilians protecting our bases from terrorists poses a greater threat than does jihad. Military ordered to “avoid them.”
  • Dispatch a Muslim-friendly DOJ lawyer to Chattanooga to “investigate” the latest terrorist attack (aka, “workplace violence”).
  • Deny purple hearts and benefits to  those killed by this terrorist attack. Just like Fort Hood. (238,000 Vets have died waiting for health care. Illegals get it free.)
  • No calls to express support from the White House. Flags not at half-staff until public outrage and after a 5-day wait. No mention of jihad by Obama.

Please note that these policies are essentially the SAME as those issued to the Border Patrol and other agencies in 2012. These policies, coupled with “sanctuary cities” and Federal restrictions on local law enforcement, are what has invited the flood of violent criminal illegals and Mexican Drug Cartels.

Run and Hide 2012

Run and HIde 2012

***

Watch: News Anchor Gets Fed Up With Obama, Says What Everyone’s Thinking In EPIC Rant

“President Obama, if you won’t say it, I will…”

Tomi Lahren, the anchor of On Point with Tomi Lahren on One America News Network (OANN), ended her program Saturday by excoriating President Obama for not affirming the attack in Chattanooga was the result of “radical Islam” and not “workplace violence.”

Lahren, originally from Rapid City, S.D., was given the opportunity to host a show on OANN at 22-years-old last September after graduating from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. “Four United States Marines are now dead,” Lahren said. “Climate change didn’t kill them. Lack of free community college didn’t kill them. The income gap, wage inequality — nope, not those things either. Gay marriage? Nope. Oh, white racism? Not that either. So what did?”

President Obama, if you won’t say it, I will: radical Islam. This is not workplace violence. This is not a criminal act with motives unknown. This is terrorism. The suspected shooter, Muhammad Abdulazeez, a devout Muslim. Do I care that he seemed like an all American young man? Do I care that he was good at mixed martial arts or a smart, quiet guy? Do I care that his high school friends wouldn’t classify him as ‘overly religious?’

“No, I don’t give a flying you know what about any of that,” Lahren continued. “Was he linked to ISIS or al-Qaeda or Hamas, or any of the 15-plus offshoot terrorist groups? Does it matter? I’m sorry, but radical Islam is becoming the rule, not the exception. Yesterday’s moderate is today’s terrorist. I care that this SOB killed four of our United States Marines, and I care that our commander-in-chief is more concerned with Muslim sensitivity than the honor and sacrifice made by these Marines.”

Now this is the twenty-first time our military men and women have been attacked here at home. This is not a Middle East problem, this is an American problem, and I’m sorry but I can’t sit here and let this go. Not anymore.

Lahren went on to say she comes from a family of Marines, which includes her grandfather, her uncle and her cousins. Since Lahren’s program was taped, a fifth victim, Petty Officer 2nd Class Randall Smith, an active-duty Navy reservist, died early Saturday. Smith’s succumbing to his wounds adds to the deaths of the four Marines: Gunnery Sgt. Thomas Sullivan, Staff Sgt. David Wyatt, Lance Cpl. Skip Wells and Sgt. Carson Holmquist.

Here is her 2:37 minute video. (Get it quick. This is being erased.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8Q0MMHwx4k

***

Blaming our heroes.

Blaming our heroes.

Late breaking news: Is Obama REALLY planning to prosecute our military members who shot back? The answer is YES, he was. (Sources: Jim Webb and Allen West, both well connected in Congress and the Pentagon.) But now it seems, the answer has changed to NO. In the face of public outrage, Obama backed down.

But we can expect (as in police incidents) Obama may have the DOJ investigate in the hope those who defended themselves can charged with something else. As in the cases of Fort Hood and Bergdahl, Obama’s power to protect jihadists is near absolute.

Also, here is the homeland security response, which is pretty amazing. It continues the Obama Administration’s policy to not speak the word, “jihad.”  Link.

Obama has clearly signaled that his policy is to defend the Image of Islam. Link.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.” 

—President Barack Hussein

– See more at: http://blog.johntrudel.com/?p=1815#sthash.DEWMEOKu.dpuf

Known Terrorist Camps

Known Terrorist Camps

This entry was posted in Actionable, Constitution & Gov, Military, Non-Fiction, Self-Defense - Guns and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Obama’s jihad friendly policy invites domestic attacks

  1. John Trudel says:

    THE PLOT THICKENS. ISIS IS HERE INTIMIDATING SERVICE FAMILIES.

    DENVER (CBS4) – An alert has been issued by the FBI to all law enforcement agencies in Colorado and Wyoming involving U.S. military families and concerns about who may be watching them.

    The alert says Middle Eastern men are approaching families of U.S. military members at their homes in Colorado and Wyoming. It mentions Greeley, Colorado, and Cheyenne, Wyoming, as the specific areas.

    In one case last May the wife of a military member was approached in front of her home by two Middle Eastern males. The men stated that she was the wife of a U.S. interrogator. When she denied their claims the men laughed. The two men left the area in a dark-colored, four-door sedan with two other Middle Eastern males in the vehicle.

    “The woman had observed the vehicle in the neighborhood on previous occasions,” the alert states.

    Similar incidents in Wyoming have been reported to the FBI throughout June 2015.

    http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/08/04/fbi-middle-eastern-men-intimidating-u-s-military-families-in-colorado-wyoming/

  2. John Trudel says:

    ONE IMPORTANT COMMENT THAT HAS COME UP SEVERAL TIMES.

    In the Obama Nation, Saul Alinsky tactics have been used to prevent honest debates between the left and the right. The tactics used are as published in Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals, which was (First Edition) dedicated to Lucifer. The tactics are to lie, polarize, vilify, and personalize. Alinsky lies are 90% true, but totally misleading.

    The main point being used to argue against ending the EO to make our bases “gun free” zones is a false premise. I’ve had a number of people with intelligence and good will (e.g., my eye doctor and my wife) being up things like “Having 40,000 18 year olds running around with guns is dangerous.”

    There are several things that make this an absurd premise for reasoned debate about policy. Here is one large one:

    No one is suggesting that the EO that makes our bases “gun free zones” be turned into its polar opposite, an EO that REQUIRES all personnel on a base must carry weapons at all times. Such an EO would be absurd, and, yes, unnecessary or even dangerous in some cases.

    All that is being suggested is that this odd Clinton-era EO should be removed so that common sense and the traditional authority, responsibility, and prerogatives of local commanders would apply. Given Obama’s Draconian purging and abuse of the military, this is a case where WE THE PEOPLE need to speak out to protect the people who protect us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *